Second Vision keeps observation, interpretation, and support separate before it presents a broader working read.
The direct answer
Second Vision records bounded inputs, preserves where each input came from, and looks for agreement or tension across methods before supporting a broader Persona read. The model can change when new evidence arrives.
This caution matters because research on game-related assessment finds meaningful but heterogeneous relationships with traditional measures. A recent meta-analysis of adult game-related assessments found that the medium and measurement design affect what can be inferred; it does not validate Second Vision or any individual game.
The three evidence families
Behavioral games record choices, errors, routes, or timing inside one specified constraint. Assessments record how you answer structured questions about yourself. Optional outside perspective records how another person experienced a behavior or tendency.
The system keeps those families separate so a self-description cannot masquerade as observed behavior and one task cannot masquerade as a complete psychological conclusion.
From a clue to a supported read
An input becomes usable only when its methodology and source identity are registered. A broader read becomes stronger when relevant evidence repeats across methods and contexts. Conflicting evidence remains visible as an open question rather than being averaged into false certainty.